75 Trials across 14 pairwise comparisons
27434 Participants
Moraes Filho, O B de. “Misoprostol versus Sonda Foley e ocitocina para indução do parto.” Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia vol. 24, no. 10 (2002).
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Prager, M et al. “A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.” BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology vol. 115,11 (2008): 1443-50.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Pennell, C E et al. “Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel.” BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology vol. 116,11 (2009): 1443-52.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Single Balloon vs Double Balloon
Oliveira, Maria Virginia de Oliveira e et al. “Sonda de Foley cervical versus misoprostol vaginal para o preparo cervical e indução do parto: um ensaio clínico randomizado” [Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial]. Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia vol. 32,7 (2010): 346-51.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Jozwiak, Marta et al. “Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.” Lancet (London, England) vol. 378,9809 (2011): 2095-103.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Jozwiak, Marta et al. “Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature.” European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology vol. 170,1 (2013): 137-45.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Jozwiak, Marta et al. “Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol: randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-M study) and systematic review and meta-analysis of literature.” American journal of perinatology vol. 31,2 (2014): 145-56.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Henry, A et al. “Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial.” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth vol. 13, 25 (2013): n.p.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Outpatient vs Inpatient Methods
Balloon vs Vaginal PGE2
Edwards, Rodney K et al. “Foley catheter compared with the controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a randomized controlled trial.” Obstetrics and gynecology vol. 123,6 (2014): 1280-1287.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Løkkegaard, E et al. “Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone.” Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology vol. 35,8 (2015): 797-802.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Diguisto, C et al. “Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: the MAGPOP randomised controlled trial.” PLoS Medicine vol. 18, no. 2 (2021): e1003448.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Beckmann, M et al. “Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.” BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology vol. 127,5 (2020): 571-579.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Outpatient vs Inpatient Methods
Balloon vs Vaginal PGE2
Wise, Michelle R et al. “Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labor: a randomized trial.” American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM vol. 5,6 (2023): 100958.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Outpatient vs Inpatient Methods
Balloon vs Vaginal PGE2
Liu, Xiaohua et al. “Vaginal dinoprostone vs Foley catheter for induction of labor at term with an unfavorable cervix: an open-label randomized controlled trial.” American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM vol. 6,9 (2024): 101436.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Ng, Yang Huang Grace et al. “Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the safety in the first 12 h, efficacy and maternal satisfaction of a double balloon catheter and prostaglandin pessary for induction of labour.” Archives of gynecology and obstetrics vol. 305,1 (2022): 11-18.
Balloon vs Vaginal Prostaglandins
Ten Eikelder, Mieke L G et al. “Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.” Lancet (London, England) vol. 387,10028 (2016): 1619-28.
Balloon vs Low Dose Oral Misoprostol
Mundle, Shuchita et al. “Foley catheterisation versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour in hypertensive women in India (INFORM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.” Lancet (London, England) vol. 390,10095 (2017): 669-680.
Balloon vs Low Dose Oral Misoprostol
Somirathne, D et al. “Three doses of oral misoprostol versus an intra-cervical Foley catheter for 24 hours for pre-induction cervical ripening in post- dated pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial.” The Ceylon medical journal vol. 62,2 (2017): 77-82.
Balloon vs Low Dose Oral Misoprostol
Kruit, Heidi et al. “Foley Catheter or Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Women with Term Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Multicenter Trial.” American journal of perinatology vol. 33,9 (2016): 866-72.
Balloon vs Low Dose Oral Misoprostol
Haugland, B et al. “Induction of labor with single- versus double-balloon catheter: a randomized controlled trial.” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica vol. 91 (2012): 84–85.
Single Balloon vs Double Balloon
Salim, Raed et al. “Single-balloon compared with double-balloon catheters for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.” Obstetrics and gynecology vol. 118,1 (2011): 79-86.
Single Balloon vs Double Balloon
Mundle, W R, and D C Young. “Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.” Obstetrics and gynecology vol. 88,4 Pt 1 (1996): 521-5.
Vaginal PGE2 vs Vaginal Misoprostol
Rozenberg, P et al. “Induction of labour with a viable infant: a randomised clinical trial comparing intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone.” BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology vol. 108,12 (2001): 1255-62.
Vaginal PGE2 vs Vaginal Misoprostol
le Roux, Paul A et al. “Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.” Obstetrics and gynecology vol. 99,2 (2002): 201-5.
Vaginal PGE2 vs Vaginal Misoprostol
Vaginal PGE2 vs Oral Misoprostol
van Gemund, N et al. “A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction.” BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology vol. 111,1 (2004): 42-9.
Vaginal PGE2 vs Vaginal Misoprostol
Gregson, Sarah et al. “A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term.” BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology vol. 112,4 (2005): 438-44.
Vaginal PGE2 vs Vaginal Misoprostol
Prager, M et al. “A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.” BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology vol. 115,11 (2008): 1443-50.
Vaginal PGE2 vs Vaginal Misoprostol
Young, D C et al. “Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: randomized controlled trial.” PLOS ONE vol. 15, no. 1 (2020): e0227245.
Vaginal PGE2 vs Vaginal Misoprostol
Vaginal PGE2 vs Oral Misoprostol
Gaudineau, Adrien et al. “Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.” American journal of obstetrics and gynecology vol. 225,5 (2021): 542.e1-542.e8.
Vaginal PGE2 vs Vaginal Misoprostol
Ausbeck, Elizabeth B et al. “Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Obstetrics and gynecology vol. 136,3 (2020): 597-606.
Outpatient vs Inpatient Methods
Chen, Vicky et al. “Outpatient versus inpatient catheter balloon cervical ripening a randomised trial” RANZOG Annual Scientific Meeting (2019)
Outpatient vs Inpatient Methods
Haavisto, Henna et al. “Experiences of induction of labor with a catheter – A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the outpatient and inpatient setting.” Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica vol. 100,3 (2021): 410-417.
Outpatient vs Inpatient Methods
Kohari, Kathehrine et al. “Inpatient Versus Outpatient Foley Cervical Ripening Study”, (2020) [UNPUBLISHED TRIAL BUT COMPLETED – NCT03725397]
Outpatient vs Inpatient Methods
Pierce-Williams, R et al. “Inpatient versus outpatient transcervical Foley catheter use for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology vol. 226, no. 1 (2022): S772–S773.
Outpatient vs Inpatient Methods
Saad, Antonio F et al. “Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” Obstetrics and gynecology vol. 140,4 (2022): 584-590.
Outpatient vs Inpatient Methods
Policiano, Catarina et al. “Outpatient versus inpatient cervix priming with Foley catheter: A randomized trial.” European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology vol. 210 (2017): 1-6.
Outpatient vs Inpatient Methods
Kuper, Spencer G et al. “Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Parous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Obstetrics and gynecology vol. 132,1 (2018): 94-101.
Outpatient vs Inpatient Methods
Dällenbach, Patrick et al. “Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.” American journal of obstetrics and gynecology vol. 188,1 (2003): 162-7.
Vaginal PGE2 vs Oral Misoprostol
Dodd, Jodie M et al. “Oral misoprostol for induction of labour at term: randomised controlled trial.” BMJ (Clinical research ed.) vol. 332,7540 (2006): 509-13.
Vaginal PGE2 vs Oral Misoprostol
Tessier, F et al. “A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing oral misoprostol to vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labour at or near term.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology vol. 176, no. 1 (1997): S111–S111.
Vaginal PGE2 vs Oral Misoprostol
Anand, Amandeep Kour and Shahida Mir. “A Randomized Comparison Between Intravaginal Misoprostol and Intracervical Dinoprostone for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction in Participants with Unfavourable Cervices.” JK Science: Journal of Medical Education & Research (2012).
Intracervical PGE2 vs Vaginal Misoprostol
Krithika, K S et al. “Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.” Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology vol. 28,3 (2008): 294-7.
Intracervical PGE2 vs Vaginal Misoprostol
Garg, Rahul et al. “Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter combined with a single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet or intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.” Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology vol. 42,2 (2022): 232-238.
Intracervical PGE2 vs Vaginal Misoprostol
Girija, S et al. “A randomized controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for labor induction.” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India vol. 61, no. 2 (2011): 153–160.
Intracervical PGE2 vs Vaginal Misoprostol
Jain, S et al. “A randomised study of low-dose oral misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and labour induction in term pregnancy.” Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences vol. 7, no. 16 (2018).
Intracervical PGE2 vs Oral Misoprostol
Cheng, Shi-Yann et al. “Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.” Obstetrics and gynecology vol. 111,1 (2008): 119-25.
Vaginal Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol
Deshmukh, Varsha Laxmikant et al. “Comparative study of efficacy and safety of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction or labour.” Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India vol. 63,5 (2013): 321-4.
Vaginal Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol
Yenuberi, Hilda et al. “A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial comparing stepwise oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour.” Tropical doctor vol. 46,4 (2016): 198-205.
Vaginal Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol
Al-Ibraheemi, Zainab et al. “Misoprostol With Foley Bulb Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Obstetrics and gynecology vol. 131,1 (2018): 23-29.
Balloon + Low-dose Vaginal Misoprostol vs Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol
Gilani, S et al. “Concurrent use of intracervical Foley catheter plus vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone for induction of labour.” Journal of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Pakistan vol. 8, no. 3 (2018): n.p.
Balloon + Low-dose Vaginal Misoprostol vs Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol
Osoti, A et al. “Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya: a randomized controlled trial.” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth vol. 18, no. 1 (2018): 300.
Balloon + Low-dose Vaginal Misoprostol vs Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol
Romero, Marino et al. “Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Supracervical Balloon Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone” [NCT02762942]
Balloon + Low-dose Vaginal Misoprostol vs Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol
Home Page 